Gender Bias in ADHD and Autism: Bridging the Gap

The diagnosis of autism and ADHD has long been riddled with gender disparities. Historically, diagnostic criteria for both conditions have been shaped by research conducted predominantly on male participants. This male-centric approach has not only skewed diagnostic frameworks but also perpetuated underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis in females. This blog explores how these biases manifest, the role of societal conditioning in female masking, and the growing awareness leading to increased recognition of neurodivergence in women.

Diagnostic Criteria Rooted in Male-Centric Research

The gender disparity in autism and ADHD diagnoses is deeply entrenched in the origins of diagnostic criteria. Early research in both fields disproportionately sampled males, resulting in diagnostic tools that reflect male-presenting traits (Lai et al., 2015; Martin et al., 2018). For instance, boys with autism often exhibit externalising behaviours, such as repetitive movements or overt social difficulties, while girls tend to display more subtle signs like social camouflaging or mimicking neurotypical behaviours (Haney, 2016).

Similarly, ADHD diagnostic frameworks have historically prioritised hyperactive and impulsive behaviours, traits more commonly associated with boys. This has led to the underrepresentation of inattentive presentations, which are more prevalent among girls (Quinn & Madhoo, 2014). The consequence is a systemic failure to recognise and support neurodivergent girls and women, leaving many without a formal diagnosis or intervention.

The Impact of Social Conditioning on Masking Behaviours

From an early age, girls are conditioned to conform to societal expectations of politeness, compliance, and emotional attunement (Rutter & Jones, 2018). This conditioning drives many neurodivergent girls to engage in masking behaviours, where they suppress or camouflage their symptoms to fit social norms. For instance, autistic girls may rehearse social interactions or mimic their neurotypical peers to avoid standing out (Dean et al., 2017; Hull et al., 2020).

Masking, while socially adaptive, comes at a high cost. It often leads to delayed diagnoses, as clinicians may overlook these subtle behaviours or attribute them to personality traits rather than neurodivergence (Hartung & Lefler, 2019). Furthermore, the effort required to maintain this façade can lead to burnout, mental health challenges, and a diminished sense of self (Murphy et al., 2023).

In ADHD, societal norms further obscure the condition in girls. Inattentive presentations, such as daydreaming, align with expectations for girls to be quiet and passive, leading to their symptoms being dismissed or misinterpreted (Quinn & Madhoo, 2014). Unlike boys, who are often identified due to disruptive classroom behaviours, girls with ADHD may struggle silently, internalising their difficulties and feeling misunderstood (Young et al., 2020).

Understanding the Unique Presentations in Females

Research has illuminated several gendered differences in the presentation of autism and ADHD. Autistic girls often exhibit a greater interest in social relationships and may appear more adept at social communication compared to boys, masking their underlying difficulties (Lai et al., 2015). However, this can be deceptive, as their social interactions may be rehearsed or lack genuine reciprocity (Gould, 2017).

Girls with ADHD, on the other hand, are more likely to experience difficulties with executive functioning, such as organising tasks or managing time, rather than displaying overt hyperactivity (Ratto et al., 2018). These struggles are often attributed to character flaws, such as laziness or carelessness, rather than recognised as symptoms of neurodivergence (Nasca et al., 2020). As a result, many women are only diagnosed later in life, often after their children receive a diagnosis that prompts them to seek assessment.

Growing Awareness and Increased Prevalence

In recent years, growing knowledge about gender differences in autism and ADHD has led to increased prevalence rates among females. Studies have highlighted the importance of recognising internalising symptoms, such as anxiety and perfectionism, which are more common in neurodivergent women (Hull et al., 2020). Additionally, advocacy efforts and advancements in diagnostic frameworks have begun to address these disparities, encouraging clinicians to consider the impact of gendered socialisation on symptom expression.

Despite this progress, challenges remain. Many diagnostic tools still lack sensitivity to the nuanced presentations seen in females, and biases persist in clinical settings (Lefler & Hartung, 2020). Overcoming these barriers requires not only updated diagnostic criteria but also widespread education for clinicians, educators, and caregivers about the unique experiences of neurodivergent women.

Conclusion

The gender bias in autism and ADHD diagnoses is a pressing issue that stems from historically male-centric research and societal expectations. This has led to underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and unmet needs for countless girls and women. By expanding diagnostic frameworks, raising awareness about gendered presentations, and challenging societal norms, we can work towards a more equitable understanding of neurodivergence. Addressing these disparities is not just a matter of fairness but a crucial step in ensuring that all individuals receive the recognition and support they deserve.

References

Dean, M., Harwood, R., & Kasari, C. (2017). The art of camouflage: Gender differences in the social behaviours of girls and boys with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 21(5), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671845

Faraone, S. V., Biederman, J., & Mick, E. (2009). The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170500471X

Gould, J. (2017). Towards understanding the under-recognition of girls and women on the autism spectrum. Autism, 21(6), 703–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316677511

Haney, J. L. (2016). Examining gender bias in autism spectrum disorder diagnostic criteria and the implications for women. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 32, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.09.008

Hull, L., Mandy, W., & Petrides, K. V. (2020). Behavioural and cognitive sex/gender differences in autism spectrum condition and typically developing males and females. Autism, 24(6), 1515–1531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319866680

Lai, M.-C., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Autism. The Lancet, 383(9920), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61784-4

Lefler, E. K., & Hartung, C. M. (2020). Sex and gender differences in ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-1134-5

Martin, J., Taylor, M. J., & Lichtenstein, P. (2018). Assessing the evidence for shared genetic risks across psychiatric disorders and traits. Psychological Medicine, 48(11), 1759–1774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003440

Quinn, P. O., & Madhoo, M. (2014). A review of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in women and girls: Uncovering this hidden diagnosis. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 16(3), 26927. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.13r01596

Rutter, M., & Jones, P. B. (2018). Child and adolescent psychiatry. Wiley Blackwell.

Young, S., Asherson, P., & Lloyd, T. (2020). ADHD: Gender bias in diagnostic and clinical assessment. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(12), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01176-1